- Beyond Belief
- A.L. De Silva
CRITIQUE OF CHRISTIAN ARGUMENTS FOR
Christians claim that there is an all-knowing, all-loving God who created and who
controls the universe. Several arguments are used to prove this idea. We will examine each
of these arguments and give the Buddhist objections to them.
The Authority of the Bible
When asked to prove God's existence, the Christian will often open the Bible and say
"The Bible says God exists, so he must." The problem is that if we ask a Hindu,
a Muslim, a Sikh or a Jew the same question they too will point to their respective holy
books as proof of the existence of their Gods. Why should we believe the Bible but not the
holy books of all the other religions? Using the Bible to prove God's existence is only
valid if we already accept that it alone contains God's words. However, we have no
evidence that this is so. In fact, as we will demonstrate later, there is strong evidence
that the Bible is a highly unreliable document.
The Existence of the Universe
In their attempts to prove God's existence, Christians will sometimes say "The
universe didn't just happen, someone must have made it and therefore there must be a
creator God." There is a major flaw in this argument. When it starts to rain we do
not ask "Who is making it rain?" because we know that rain is caused not by someone
but by something - natural phenomena like heat, evaporation, precipitation, etc.
When we see smooth stones in a river, we do not ask "Who polished those stones?"
because we know that the smooth surface of the stones was caused not by someone but
by something - natural causes like the abrasive action of water and sand.
All of these things have a cause (or causes) but this need not be a being. It is the
same with the universe - it was not brought into being by a God but by natural phenomena
like nuclear fission, gravity, inertia, etc. However, even if we believe that a divine
being is needed to explain how the universe came into existence, what proof is there that
it was the Christian God? Perhaps it was created by the Hindu God, the God of Islam or one
of the gods worshipped by tribal religions. After all most religions, not only
Christianity claim that their God or gods created the universe.
The Argument from Design
In response to the above refutation, the Christian will maintain that the universe does
not merely exist but its existence shows perfect design. There is, a Christian might say,
an order and balance which point to its having been designed by a higher intelligence, and
that this higher intelligence is God. But as before, there are some problems with this
Firstly, how does the Christian know that it was his God who is behind creation?
Perhaps it was the gods of non-Christian religions who designed and created the universe.
Secondly, how does the Christian know that only one God designed everything? In
fact, as the universe is so intricate and complex we could expect it to need the
intelligence of several, perhaps dozens, of gods to design it. So if anything the argument
from design proves that there are many gods, not one as Christians claim.
Next, we would have to ask, is the universe perfectly designed? We must ask this
because if a perfect God designed and created the universe, then that universe should be
perfect. Let us first look at inanimate phenomena to see whether they show perfect design.
Rain gives us pure water to drink but sometimes it rains too much and people lose their
lives, their homes and their means of livelihood in floods. At other times it doesn't rain
at all and millions die in drought and famine. Is this perfect design? The mountains give
us joy as we see them reaching up into the sky. But landslides and volcanic eruptions have
for centuries caused havoc and death. Is this perfect design? The gentle breezes cool us
but storms and tornadoes repeatedly cause death and destruction. Is this perfect design?
These and other natural calamities prove that inanimate phenomena do not exhibit perfect
design and therefore that they were not created by a perfect God.
Now let us look at animate phenomena to see whether they reveal perfect design. At a
superficial glance, nature seems to be beautiful and harmonious; all creatures are
provided for and each has its task to perform. However, as any biologist will confirm,
nature is utterly ruthless. To live, each creature has to feed on other creatures and
struggle to avoid being eaten by other creatures. In nature, there is no time for pity,
love or mercy. If a loving God designed everything, why did such a cruel design result?
The animal kingdom is not only imperfect in the ethical sense, it is also imperfect in
that it often goes wrong. Every year millions of babies are born with physical or mental
disabilities, or are stillborn or die soon after birth. Why would a perfect creator God
design such terrible things?
So if there is design in the universe, much of it is faulty and cruel. This would seem
to indicate that the universe was not created by a perfect all-loving God.
The First Cause Argument
Christians will sometimes say that everything has a cause, that there must be a first
cause, and that God is the first cause. This old argument contains its own refutation, for
if everything has a first cause then the first cause must also have a cause.
There is another problem with the first cause argument. Logically there is no good
reason to assume that everything had a single first cause. Perhaps six, ten or
three hundred causes occurring simultaneously caused everything.
Christians claim that miracles are sometimes performed in God's name and that the fact
that this happens proves that God exists. This is an appealing argument until it is looked
at a little more closely.
While Christians are quick to claim that because of their prayers the blind could see,
the deaf could hear and crooked limbs were straightened, they are very slow in producing
evidence to back up their claims. In fact, some Christians are so anxious to prove that
miracles have occurred at their prayer meetings that the truth often gets lost in a flood
of wild claims, extravagant boasts, and sometimes even conscious lies.
It is true that things which are unusual and difficult to explain do sometimes happen
during religious events - but not just for Christians. Hindus, Muslims, Taoists, etc. all
claim that their God or gods sometimes perform miracles. Christianity certainly does not
have a monopoly on miracles. So, if miracles performed in God's name prove the existence
of the Christian God, then miracles performed in the name of numerous other gods must
likewise prove that they too exist.
Christians may try to overcome this fact by claiming that, when miracles occur in other
religions, they are done through the power of the Devil. Perhaps the best way to counter
this claim is to quote the Bible. When Jesus healed the sick, his enemies accused him of
doing this through the power of the Devil. He answered that healing the sick results in
good and if the Devil went around doing good he would destroy himself (Mk 3:22-26).
Therefore the same could be said for the miracles performed by Hindus, Jews or Sikhs. If
these miracles result in good, how can they be the work of the Devil?
The Argument for God's Necessity
Christians will often claim that only by believing in God will people have the strength
to deal with life's problems, and therefore that belief in God is necessary. This claim is
apparently supported by numerous books written by Christians who have endured and overcome
various crises through the power of God. Some of these books make highly inspiring
reading, so the claim that one can cope with problems only with God's help sounds rather
convincing - until we look a little more deeply.
If this claim is true, we would expect most of the non-Christian people of the world to
lead lives of emotional distress, confusion and hopelessness while most Christians through
their faith in God would be able to unfailingly deal with their problems and to never need
to seek help from counsellors or psychiatrists. It is clear, however, that people from
non-Christian religions and even those with no religion are just as capable of dealing
with life's crises as Christians are - sometimes even better. It is also sometimes the
case that people who are devout Christians lose their faith in God after being confronted
with serious personal problems. Consequently, the claim that belief in God is necessary to
cope with and overcome problems is baseless.
The "Try and Disprove" Argument
When Christians find they cannot prove God's existence with doubtful facts or logic,
they may switch tactics and say "Perhaps it can't be proved that God exists, but
neither can you disprove it". This of course is quite true. You cannot prove that God
doesn't exist - but neither can you prove that the gods of Taoism, Hinduism and a dozen
other religions do not exist. In other words, despite all the hyperbole, the extravagant
claims and the confident proclamations, there is no more evidence for the existence of the
Christian God than there is for the gods worshipped in other religions.
After everything else has failed, the Christian may finally try to convince us that God
exists by appealing to the emotions. Such a person will say, perhaps quite truthfully,
"I used to be unhappy and discontented but after giving myself to God I am happy and
at peace with myself." Such testimonies can be deeply moving, but what do they prove?
There are millions of people whose lives became equally happy and meaningful after they
embraced Buddhism, Hinduism or Islam. Likewise, there are no doubt many people whose lives
have not changed for the better after they became Christians - the same weaknesses
and problems sometimes remain. So this argument, like all the others, does not prove the
existence of the Christian God.